Over 58621
politifake

Rate Politics


Bernie & Hillary -




This is why -




Democrat Robert C. Byrd -




NOVEMBER'S COMING - Can't you tell by the smell of desperate Democrats in the air???... the odor of bullshit campaign promises coming from their mouths...the smear attacks, etc....??




AGNOSTICISM - The only true Religion.




You really are a special kind of stupid, aren't ya? -


TAGS: sam elliot confederate flag slavery
Rating: 4.34/5

More politifakes by mittromney

mittromney - July 31, 2015, 5:01 pm
/My ride's here.Got2run.Hopefully see you all again in a couple months if work and family permit./Submitted my final meme,an homage to events of late.Cant take credit for it,somebody posted it2my FB weeks back.She gave me consent to share it. Bye peeps~Q/
mittromney - July 31, 2015, 4:54 pm
/That's not fair. How is he supposed to answer than question? OTC doesn't even know if he's a man {Comment#59471,#59523} and he blames you for the confusion{comment#78115}/
crankyhead - July 31, 2015, 4:44 pm
OTC, are you saying that you don't think Bruce Jenner was a man in 1976?
OTC - July 31, 2015, 4:11 pm
Just extrapolating your logic, if this doesn't make sense, neither does your poster
mittromney - July 31, 2015, 1:58 pm
/that's about as much sense as I could make out of your comment about Bruce Jenner. Special kind of stupid, indeed./
mittromney - July 31, 2015, 1:56 pm
against empiricism. Who would be threatened by that? Well, in posters like #54214 you show your real colors ~ your real beef is the age old Christian fundy war on the age of reason, and you'll use every dirty political trick in the book to advance it./
mittromney - July 31, 2015, 1:50 pm
/your "proof" against empiricism is semantics and stuff like that ~ e.g. that Republicans used to be called Democrats before they switched party names, e.g, that global warming is now called man-made climate change. In that you think you found proof
mittromney - July 31, 2015, 1:42 pm
/If you think this comment is supposed to make sense, especially when this poster has nothing to do with Bruce Jenner, YOU'RE a special kind of stupid./
OTC - July 31, 2015, 9:56 am
If you think a man won a gold medal in the 1976 decathlon just because a women who really won it used to be a man, you're a special kind of stupid.
fauxnews - July 9, 2015, 2:51 pm
No prob Q. Like that; gives me more room with this awful 255 character limit in a comment. Have a good one, mate. Cheers :-)
mittromney - July 8, 2015, 9:56 pm
/you got it right. if the Mitt thing throws you off, just call me Quinn or Q. If I can't change it, i might make a new acct/
fauxnews - July 8, 2015, 9:38 pm
Your are projecting. Other than the humor, the rest of Mitt's poster is historically accurate .......... Btw, welcome to Politifake! :-) Hope you enjoy your stay. Cheers, from one member to another.
Libertas - July 8, 2015, 9:34 pm
when it comes to progressives, leave it to them to redefine black as white, up as down, yes as no, ad infinitem


WALMART - Corporate America's contribution to Communist China's Military Might.




What's a Good Socialist to do? -




Liberal Logic -


TAGS: liberal logic confederate flag jay carney soviet propaganda posters communist dukes of hazzard racism bigotry hypocrisy
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

DebtToAmerica - July 3, 2015, 3:34 am
the confederate flag is being a**ociated with racism because racism is indefensible, and they cant allow the people to have a well-known symbol of rebellion against government. soviet propaganda on the other hand fits very well with the current regime


Hillary's Confederate Flag Hypocrisy -




if we are going to remove the Confederate flag because it's racist and divisive -




MEET THE STAFF -


TAGS: infiltrated
Rating: 4.6/5

More politifakes by JGalt

arnnatz - September 25, 2012, 12:54 am
Of course I saw it, didn't Chrissy Matthew talk it about it when he was having one of his obamagasms?
GrouchoMarxist - September 24, 2012, 11:49 pm
Yes ma'am


TYRANNY - oppressive power (every form of tyranny over the mind of man) - Thomas Jefferson; especially: oppressive power exerted by government (the tyranny of a police state)




WELFARE FRAUD - Acceptable if you're a big corporation?


TAGS: corporate welfare
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

StoneTools - June 7, 2013, 8:58 am
her non-existent farm and the solar industry need the money to help pay for their bankruptcies, and the IRS needs its subidies for lavish conferences, and the obamas need subsidies for their multi-million dollar vacations
StoneTools - June 7, 2013, 8:55 am
why concentrate on oil companies when you have agriculture subsidies, energy subsidies, export subsidies, education subsidies, and many others. I understand that a woman living in an apartment overlooking central park in new york needs the money for
Rudedog - February 14, 2013, 10:00 pm
Absolutely correct! The lobbyist influence in Washington has turned a capitalist democracy into a corporatist theocracy.
Renza - February 14, 2013, 8:06 am
Makes sense until you don't think about it.


Iraq under siege -




BAIN CAPITAL - The only ones who care about when Romney left Bain are desperate Democates and Trivial Pursuit




CORPORATE GREED - Much uglier than it seems.




American Badass -




Deplorable DNC Diva -




OBAMA'S WEEK IN REVIEW - Lowest polls ever. Gas passing $4, Chevy Volt still can't sell. Deficit $3.5 trillion higher than thought. Obamacare cost doubles. Afghanistan unravelling. Phoney "War on Women" claims Maher instead of Limbaugh.




OPRAH SAYS..... - America would have had breadlines if Obama was not elected President. Hmmm with now 1 in 7 Amaricans on welfare- and > 20% unemployment isn't that the modern version of a breadline??




Don't like Entitlements? -




LATEST POLL NUMBERS IN - stupid is as stupid does........




LIBERAL HYPOCRITE MICHAEL MOORE - While wailing on about the evils of capitalism he lives the lifestyle that only capitalism could bring




INFLATION - Since the 90's, our government has removed food and fuel from the inflation rate calculation. This is one more way how they lie about the economy....




SEPARATED AT BIRTH - Do you see the resemblance?




SCREW CORPORATE AMERICA - "Oh, wait, I'm getting a text message on my 4G phone!"




Bernie Sanders Sends the Most Economically Illiterate Tweet Ever -


TAGS: bernie sanders economic illiterate democrat socialist liberal lunacy progressive moonbat commie codger vermont hippie dnc warmist p***ert feel the bern
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by TheConservativeInsurgent

Libertas - December 27, 2015, 3:09 pm
so then a liberal arts degree can be held at a 10% rate and a technical degree more like 4-6% since its more likely to result in a paying job other than one that requires one to say "You want fries with that", or "your latte is ready" ???


AW CRAP - its getting closer to desperate liberal season again. Say, do anything to win an election, because their policies, like ther promises are empty, so they have to demonize their opponentts to win




GAG ORDER - Because Gloria Allred needs to STFU!




WHO AM I? -


TAGS: goldman sachs corporate personhood
Rating: 2.7/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

crankyhead - September 19, 2012, 7:11 pm
Seriously, I made this a year ago. What're the odds?
crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:17 pm
Hey Willard... is this the type of 47% you were talking about? Corporations are people, right?


HYPOCRISY IN ACTION -




" OBAMA'S MODEL FOR AMERICA: DETROIT " - The National Institute for Literacy estimates that 47% of adults in the City of Detroit ........... are functionally illiterate.




Terror threat in Yemen -




OBAMACARE - your new Insurance approved this OBGYN




ECONOMIC FACTS AND DATA - Obama supporters have a defense mechanism.




DEMOCRATS HAVE CHANGED! - Or is it just me?




THEY CALL US JACK BAUER REPUBLICANS - Other liberals who foam at the mouth when they talk call us tea baggers. We prefer the term Conservative Constitutionalists.




ANOTHER LIBERAL MYTH - 'Democrats are better than Republicans on domestic policies' These numbers don't lie. Democratic politicians keep their cities poor so their slaves stay in the party line.




WHO AM I? -


TAGS: general electric corporate personhood
Rating: 3.11/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:16 pm
Seriously, I made this a year ago. What're the odds?
crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:14 pm
Hey Willard... is this the type of 47% you were talking about? Corporations are people, right?


CORPORATE WELFARE -


TAGS: corporate welfare
Rating: 3/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

terroraustralis - April 3, 2013, 3:56 am
5L


SCHOLIAST POLICIES - Ain't wantin none of that.




Liberal Logic -




Senile Socialist -




PINWHEEL . . . - . . . windmill, all the same in the minds of the sane and intelligent.




BARNEY IS MOONLIGHTING - Guess where he spends time when he goes back to Boston to get in touch with his electorate- that's right: Logan Int'l Airport!




THE PARTY OF..... - High unemployment, foodstamps, welfare, hate-speech, corruption, poverty and misery




WHO AM I? -


TAGS: valero energy corporate personhood
Rating: 2.71/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:44 pm
Seriously, I made this a year ago. What're the odds?
crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:16 pm
Hey Willard... is this the type of 47% you were talking about? Corporations are people, right?


WHO AM I? -


TAGS: chevron corporate personhood
Rating: 2.54/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:49 pm
Seriously, I made this a year ago. What're the odds?
crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:17 pm
Hey Willard... is this the type of 47% you were talking about? Corporations are people, right?


WHO AM I? -


TAGS: exxonmobil corporate personhood
Rating: 2.45/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 8:47 pm

Obviously I haven't considered every angle, but why not?...we sponsor kids that are good enough to play in our league, but it's the exposure that draws them, not the money.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 8:45 pm
I dunno, say he wanted to come for the exposure.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 8:36 pm

I guess so, But why would a 15 year old come here to play junior hockey? Remember (in my imaginary hockey utopia) the money isn't worth coming here for. I guess we could sponsor kids from other countries.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 8:27 pm
Subsidy: a financial aid supplied by a government, as to industry, for reasons of public welfare, the balance of payments, etc. So obviously, only those tax remittances that go back to the company in the form of a**istance, are called subsidies, Groucho.
GrouchoMarxist - October 8, 2012, 7:19 pm
This a cranky "Punked Alert" Expect more strawmen, non answers and loads of "What ifs"
GrouchoMarxist - October 8, 2012, 7:17 pm
So any tax for doing business is a subsidy if you're an oil company... s****** the koolaide
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 7:16 pm
So a 15 year old Finnish kid, say, would have to apply for dual citizenship, before he could play in your league?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 7:14 pm
Your mom said; "As soon as you start finishing your vegetables." =)
GrouchoMarxist - October 8, 2012, 6:55 pm
I wonder when I'll get my subsidy?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:35 pm

As long as you're a citizen.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:32 pm
So, are there no foreign born players in your league, or did I read that wrong?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:32 pm

Hockey should be about hockey and playing with the Americans has made hockey about money.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:28 pm

I could have worded that better. I want out of the NHL, I want big Canadian cities to have teams and one western and one eastern junior leagues to feed the CHL (Canadian hockey league) players.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:23 pm
OHL, WHL, QMJHL...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:18 pm

I want Provincial teams with $150,000 a year salary caps......That would be promoting Canadian culture.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:16 pm
Yes. The NHL is a mess. 3 lockouts in 17 years. Ugh. The fans need a union. =)
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:14 pm

Don't get me wrong. I love the sport, just not the mess that the NHL has become. I still cheer for team Canada.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:10 pm

Kind of of like what Toronto does to Northern Ontario.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:09 pm

I do hate hockey, And I'm not a big fan of Winnipeg. They make decisions that affect the entire province, but they've forgotten that there are people outside the perimeter highway.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:05 pm
LOL! As if you didn't want the WPGJets back. I know you don't like hockey, but come on man.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 6:04 pm
On this issue, I'm confident with the word 'never'.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:03 pm

I also didn't want the WPG Jets back. (:
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:02 pm

That was in response to the jets. I'd have to read up about the crime bill. But I know we could use a few new prisons in Manitoba.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 6:00 pm

Never say never, But you're probably right. Of course it's a waste of money.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:59 pm
Or the Omnibus crime bill expenses? Building jails we don't need to house criminals that don't exist, wouldn't we be saving more money there?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:57 pm
What's your position on that new fleet of F-35's that Harper wants to buy? Isn't that a bit more frivolous a pricetag than the CBC, considering we'll never have to use them?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:56 pm

You know I don't back a party. I refuse to chose between 2 groups of morons. I take every issue as a solitary entity and make my decision.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:49 pm
That last sentence was sarcasm. =)
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:49 pm
I know, right? Remember back when the Liberal party of Canada posted 10 straight years (1998-2008) of budget surpluses under Chretien and Martin? Those were the days, huh? Good thing we've gone back in the red with the Conservative Harper. =)
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:39 pm

Or it's a billion dollars a year off the top of a $591,344,594,012.45 debt (as of Sept 21st) It all depends on what you see as more important. We'll just have to agree to disagree.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:32 pm
That's a 9 cent a day per capita investment, to not have our culture a**imilated. I'm fine with it.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:31 pm

Like I said, Try watching CBC TV.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:31 pm

I don't think that the CBC provides $1,000,000,000 a year worth of culture.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:27 pm
This brings us back to the 'Kardashian' argument. The CBC promotes Canadian culture. That's a service, as a Canadian, that I enjoy.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:26 pm

I said it was OK to hold them to different standards because one is a necessary evil the other is just evil. I'm just being practical.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:25 pm

we don't need the CBC.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:24 pm

And I already told you I don't agree with subsidizing oil companies...In fact, they should be paying us for the privilege. But the CBC does nothing for us, and oil companies are used to getting handouts. The difference is that we need oil companies.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:22 pm
...and another way for those guys.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:22 pm
Otherwise, we're making these judgements based on favoring one product or service over another. Either companies can sustain themselves, or they can't. We either pick socialism, or we pick free market capitalism. It can't be one way for these guys...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:22 pm

They definitely wouldn't get away with spending public money on p***ography.http://www.torontosun.com/2012/02/02/cbc-doubles-down-on-p***ography
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:19 pm
I totally understand your point Moo. Yes, 5 is half of 10. What I'm driving at here is that if we're going to argue that one company should get 5, because it is half of 10, than this should apply to all companies, big oil included.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:19 pm

I'd be OK with keeping the Radio stations. But do me a favour, Go home tonight and watch CBC television. Come back tomorrow and tell me if we need that.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:18 pm
The CBC is a by product of the CRTC and the Canadian Broadcasting Act, is it not? SunMedia, as a private entity, aren't held to the same content criteria as the CBC, are they?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:17 pm

And 5 is still half of 10. I said I didn't agree with giving them anything. But I'm not even going to hope for that....too many bleeding hearts in our country.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:15 pm
Fair enough, but SunMedia is owned by a much larger corporate entity, and the protection of that corporate umbrella gives SunMedia access to capital that is being subsidized by other sectors. The CBC isn't in the wireless telephone market, for example.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:12 pm
You can call it whatever you want to, but a tax break, is a subsidy, is a handout.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:12 pm

But it's better than nothing.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:11 pm

Everyone needs entertainment that doesn't include the Kardashians, Privatize the CBC and give them the same breaks as Sunmedia. Bingo!, we just saved %500 million dollars a year. I don't even like that solution.....
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 5:09 pm

Yes, which is why I mentioned my distaste for them. and they have received help from the government, but not the 500 million that the CBC claimed. They got breaks, not handouts.I don't agree with that either.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:03 pm
The CBC provides Canadian content to the public airwaves. There needs to be at least a couple of stations up here that aren't addicted to the Kardashian sisters, no? =)
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 5:02 pm
Isn't SunMedia owned by Quebecor?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:43 pm

And yes, I understand that the sun network is disgusting and right wing. but at least we're not giving the a billion dollars for stale entertainment.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:42 pm

What is the CBC providing?...........This is an old article, but it's a good example of the cbc's entitled attitude.http://www.torontosun.com/2011/10/19/cbc-lashes-out-over-scrutiny-of-spending
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:41 pm

Correction, We just slashed %10 from their budget. Good job conservative government. (I'll never say good Job Steve)
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:38 pm
Cheers moo, I'd appreciate reading that.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:38 pm
Companies provide goods and services to the market place. That's the comparison. Just because they provide different goods and services, doesn't mean they should operate by a different set of rules. It's the same argument.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:37 pm

I'll find the Sun article about french vs english channel spending by the CBC....It doesn't seem to be on their website anymore.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:36 pm

Why do you have to make any comparison to oil companies? It's a simple question, Is the CBC worth a billion dollars in tax money every year?......NO. Is PBS worth 500 million to the Americans? ..No. Oil subsidies are a different argument.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:29 pm
...sets of rules for different sectors, than why are you angry about there being different sets of rules for different sectors? Is it that you just don't like the goods and services offered by french language television? Because that's not an excuse.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:28 pm
If you're saying that you can hold different sectors to different rules, but at the same time, you're complaining about a perceived 'french programming bias' on the CBC, I'm not sure I understand your argument. If you're not angry about different sets...
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:26 pm
So, it's your opinion, that public broadcasting is COMPLETELY irrelevant?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:25 pm
I listen to CBC radio more than I watch CBCTV, to be honest. Can you cite a source that shows the budgetary bias in the CBC towards french language programming? I'd be interested to see it.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:25 pm

No, I don't want my taxes subsidizing oil companies. and yes, you can hold different sectors to different rules. If one sector is COMPLETELY irrelevant.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:23 pm
Either every company gets to benefit from tax incentives/credits/subsidies, or none of them do. It's either socialism or it's free market enterprise. It can't be one way for some, and the other way for others. You see what I mean?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:23 pm

Do you watch the cbc?....We spend as much on french programming as we do on English, Is the country %50 French? Last year we paid for the french to buy softcore p*** from France and put it on a public network.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:21 pm
This is the disconnect I'm trying to illustrate. You can't hold one sector accountable to a different set of rules, simply because you don't like what goods and services that sector is offering.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:19 pm
Fine. You don't want your taces supporting the CBC. Great. How do you feel about your tax dollars supporting Petro Canada? Or worse, how do you feel about foreign oil companies getting tax subsidies in Canada?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 4:17 pm
A bias towards the french? What are you talking about?
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:16 pm

The only thing I hate more is Manitoba public insurance....Be glad you live in a province with private insurance. Because we're getting f***ed hard.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:14 pm

We spend more than a billion dollars a year to watch reruns of crap that were made in the 70's. Add a bias toward the french, and it's a God d*** national tragedy.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 4:09 pm

Personally, I don't want my tax dollars supporting the CBC, and If I were American I think I'd feel the same about PBS. If these shows are so great, then they'd do just fine on a privately owned and funded network.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 3:46 pm
If both companies are receiving federal aid in order to survive, then both should be subject to the same criticism about receiving that aid, no? Or is big oil just simply too big to be criticized?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 3:44 pm
... excuse me, people.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 3:43 pm
Of course I support the CBC. I'm trying to illustrate the disconnect that exists in the conservative mindset, when they jump up and down and stamp their feet in anger over one company being subsidized, but remain eerily silent for other corporations,...
Mooooooooooooooooooo - October 8, 2012, 2:09 pm

So, Do you agree with the money our government spends on the CBC?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 12:42 pm
...is only what, 40 years old? Longer, maybe?
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 12:40 pm
A week ago, not one single one of you had an issue with PBS. Today, because Dr. Oz decreed it from the pulpit, every last one of you hates PBS. But you're right, it must be the left who's brainwashed. I mean, the whole 'end big oil subsidy' argument...
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 12:39 pm
...wilfully disconnect the oil companies from having to do the same thing. You're simply shilling for these companies to keep stealing your tax dollars, while b***** the war drum, looking for big bird's head. Respectfully, you remind me of a sheep.
crankyhead - October 8, 2012, 12:37 pm
Actually, your definition is based entirely on your own interpretation of fact. What is dishonest is that you're arguing that PBS should be able to compete in the free market against ABC, CBS, etc..., without recieving taxpayer subsidies, but then you...
WTFO - October 8, 2012, 3:00 am
BTW, I looked and found that PBS gets about $450M annually. Here's the difference tax breaks are not the same as handouts. The govt can't claim that not taking peoples money is the same as spending our taxes. It's a dishonest argument from the start.
WTFO - October 8, 2012, 2:54 am
more to the story. These tax breaks are not specifically for oil companies. They are the same tax breaks EVERY business gets. http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/05/about_those_oil_subsidies.html. Another liberal myth blown up with facts.
WTFO - October 8, 2012, 2:53 am
Being the only one to comment on your poster is sad. Here, let me help your misguided attacks on Exxon. I did some research. The 'subsidies' everyone is talking about are not tax dollars being sent to oil (or Exxon), they are tax breaks. However, there is
crankyhead - October 7, 2012, 10:59 pm
Like Exxon. They get way more money from the taxpayer than PBS does. Not only that, Exxon is a corporation. And 'Corporations are people, my friend.', aren't they? Where's the ire and outrage for Exxon the welfare queen?
crankyhead - September 19, 2012, 12:28 am
Seriously, I made this a year ago. What're the odds?
crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:17 pm
Hey Willard... is this the type of 47% you were talking about? Corporations are people, right?


WHO AM I? -


TAGS: conoco phillips corporate personhood
Rating: 2.43/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:40 pm
Seriously, I made this a year ago. What're the odds?
crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:16 pm
Hey Willard... is this the type of 47% you were talking about? Corporations are people, right?


WHO AM I? -


TAGS: bank of america corporate personhood
Rating: 2/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:17 pm
Hey Willard... is this the type of 47% you were talking about? Corporations are people, right?


WHO AM I? -


TAGS: citigroup corporate personhood
Rating: 1.67/5

More politifakes by crankyhead

crankyhead - September 18, 2012, 10:17 pm
Hey Willard... is this the type of 47% you were talking about? Corporations are people, right?


REALITY CHECK- OBAMA ADMITS TO HAVING NO MIDDLE EAST STRATEGY -




SEPARATED AT BIRTH -




THE CLINTON/OBAMA STRATEGY TO KEEP US OUT OF WAR -




Separated at Birth?* -


TAGS: separated at birth
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by EmmaRoydes

fauxnews - August 3, 2014, 7:22 pm
Funny poster. Especially the 3rd world part. But I can't recommend it because Steve "Urkel" is misspelled here ;-) (i.e. Erkel). You should redux this. It's funny enough to demand a 2nd viewing.


BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE LETTER "DUH" -




DESPERATION - Does not want soldiers voting in key states!




" Sequester Roots" -




IT'S TIME - For Stephen Decatur To pay another little visit To Libya




OBAMA'S IRAQ STRATEGY -




Church & State -


TAGS: keep them separate
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by BobbEdwards

Curlyrocks - May 24, 2013, 5:50 pm
And they all fight and scream like hell when they had the power and are lousing it.


THE STRATEGY - do you see the pattern yet?




John Tyler -




The extremists -


TAGS: the silent moderate majority
Rating: 5/5

More politifakes by Rudedog

Rudedog - May 1, 2013, 7:39 am
Let me know if you find one.
StoneTools - May 1, 2013, 2:50 am
You mean there is an outlet that isn't politically influenced?
Rudedog - April 30, 2013, 10:51 pm
Yeah, that's what the majority of voters base their opinion on. The views of the politically influenced media. All the networks hated Dr. Paul because he was a rogue, non political, constitutional economist that only "bowed down" to intellect and reason.
Curlyrocks - April 30, 2013, 10:18 pm
I get what your getting at and I would agree to a point, but most media portrays him as "the extreme right" so I figured I would use him as an example, I don't consider Nader much of one either, but my point was more that these "extremists" are better.
Rudedog - April 30, 2013, 10:02 pm
I would debate that Ron Paul is far from an extremist but rather the absolute voice of moderate reason, that is if you don't find the constitution as extremist.
Curlyrocks - April 30, 2013, 9:55 pm
Moderates ruined the nation, they sit in the middle and bow down to corporations and the same status quo B/S that put us in the situation in the 1st place. Extremists like Ron Paul and Ralph Nader have more in common and better plans to help then moderats


THE FOODSTAMP GAMES -




Independence Day -




MILITARY VOTE - The Liberal strategy....




UNEMPLOYMENT RATE FALLS TO 7.8% IN SEPTEMBER - WOULD OBAMA COOK THE BOOKS TO GET RE-ELECTED? (THE CHICAGO WAY)




"The United States is never going to retreat from the world. We don't get terrorized," -




VOTE OBAMA- LOSE YOUR VIRGINITY -




THE OBAMA CAMPAIGN -




Ponzi schemes -




LEGITIMATE- THE ONE WORD WHICH THE HOPES AND DREAMS OF ALL DEMOCRATS REST -




OBAMA'S CURRENT RATINGS - are much higher now that bin Laden's dead. Can you imagine how low they'd be if he refused to give the order to kill that S.O.B.?




OBAMA'S GRAND STRATEGY ON IRAQ -


TAGS: obama s grand strategy on iraq
Rating: 4.33/5

More politifakes by foxrecon19d

foxrecon19d - September 17, 2014, 12:27 pm
Actually had a college puke tell me that. The Republicans purposely LOST the election TWICE so that they could execute a secret plan hatched up by George Bush to make Obama, a black man, look stupid. It was a class that was taught in political science
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 11:27 am
I think the real culprit in this whole thing is ... wait for it ... Bush! Yeah, that's the trick, Bush did it. I wasn't aware he was savvy enough to do all this, but, think about it. He started another war. The bastid.
foxrecon19d - September 17, 2014, 11:01 am
"Uh, thenk yu. Thenk yu' ver' much. Now fer' ma' next number.. You aina' nuthin' but a hound dog! A rockin' alla' time!"
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 10:27 am
Kind of like a crappy, low budget imitation of a Monty Python skit.
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 10:19 am
and you had ring-side seats for the shouting match. It was ad- and sugar-free, low caffeine and low calorie. Kind of like a diet delight or lightweight version of a b****-slap fight. You have to admit it would have made a good youtube video.
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 10:15 am
You have to excuse TA, once he gets into attack mode, it's really hard for him to stop baring his fangs.
EmmaRoydes - September 17, 2014, 10:10 am
but that shows you just how awesome it really is. Loved by all, no negative comments on it. You should be proud that it was so well received.
foxrecon19d - September 17, 2014, 12:23 am
C'mon, guys. I know this poster is awesome and all. But the thing says "211 more comments...." That's just weird.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 10:16 pm

You know you can't talk like that here. Also, I don't care what you fellas do on other sites and I won't be bullied into taking sides on this issue. Walk away gentlemen.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 10:14 pm

I got all of the information in my posts from the comment thread, I haven't received a PM from Emma in months. Maybe I can't tell you what a man of science would do but I can tell you what a Man would do and it isn't "wish someone would die in a fire"...
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:48 pm
Where's the apology to me for accusing me or for you and TA calling me a liar?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:46 pm
respect for.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:46 pm
opinion, it was either TA or one of his attack kitties that did it. Think copycat and flattery and old sayings. That's why, unlike TA, I don't take this **** seriously at all. But I don't like being called a f***tard or f***wit by someone who I have no
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:44 pm
That's the problem for you two, I'm not concerned about it, I merely brought it up to show how immature you guys are. If you notice, I didn't make threats, I didn't call either of you any names (other than clowns), I merely posted the fact that, in my
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:42 pm
If you want to talk about coincidences, try looking at when ta attacked me for the snail poster, then go to the other site and see when the emmaroydes account was created.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:40 pm
if you want peace, i'm for it. but you should at least come half way and extend the olive branch for your part in this. at least apologize to Terror for making a false accusation against us and withdraw it.We didn't impersonate you on the web.Take it easy
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:38 pm
if you really were worried about being impersonated elsewhere, you could've maturely complained about it in private. But then you wouldn’t have been able to use it as a personal attack against TA. that's where I think you slipped up. you're full of it
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:38 pm
to me it looks like YOU clearly wanted TA to publicly see all of this because you know once he saw that phony TA acct it would p-iss him off.That phony TA acct mysteriously went up ONLY a short while BEFORE you posted about it here. also a coincidence?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:37 pm
u couldn't resist rubbing it AGAIN that TA was corrected by a MOD in your post to 0TC. then to pour salt in the wound you just so happen to accuse TA of impersonating you in the same string of attacks to conveniently make your case against us.Coincidence?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:37 pm
if peace is what you want, then mocking TA or rubbing it in when an admin corrects him isn't the way to do it. bear in mind, he and I are good friends but I'm my own man. I can be friends with you. but here is the problem I see with all of this:
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:34 pm
can forget about any cooperation from them in resolving this, as TA seems to think it is, "Internet destroying crisis"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:32 pm
Yeah, I thought weasel sounded a little better. Would you prefer ferret? What exactly is "my other site"? I just went to the site to see if there were any other developments and, from the sounds of things, they think this site is a joke. So I think you
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:20 pm
as chupacabra said earlier, neither of us owns a patent on the name we use here, so just laugh it off, move on, and be the azzhole that we all know you are.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 9:17 pm
Im a weasel now? I'm special kind of X-man mutant: Animorphman. A friendly heads up...it appears the phony TA account was banned on your other site along with the others. why am I not surprised? TA's real acct there is the only one I believe was REAL
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:17 pm
The seriousness? hahahaha, to you, it must the equivalent of a full scale a**ault on sydney by ISIS.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:15 pm
I'm sorry, I'm a little hard of hearing, can you shout just a little bit louder? I don't want to miss any of your ranting and blather, because you're so cute when you're mad.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 9:12 pm
nah, curly, it's more fun to watch terror act like an internet bully. Kick sand in his face every so often and watch him get pissed off and maybe, just maybe, he'll bring some more attack weasels onto the site.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 8:02 pm
i CLEARLY STATED that we've asked the science forum admins for the IP address used to access the "emmaroydes" account on that site, LEARN TO f***ING READ.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 7:58 pm
why are you trying to downplay the seriousness of this? oh, right, because i just told you that you're gonna get caught.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 7:56 pm
vik was a mental patient who spammed this site to the point of suppressing other user contributions... but as far as i know, he never impersonated someone else on another website.
Curlyrocks - September 16, 2014, 7:48 pm
I'm going to accuse Vik of all this stalking nonsense. He spent years making this site intolerable only to get the boot, now you guys are doing it for him. NO ONE PLAY OFF THIS COMMENT TO ACCUSE SOME ONE ELSE OF BEING VIK!
Curlyrocks - September 16, 2014, 7:42 pm
Come on people, can't we use the internet to stalk celebrities and our Ex's like normal weirdos, do we half to stalk nobodies on the other side of the earth?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 7:36 pm
I would hope that you would do the same thing for the emmaroydes account, but then, you wouldn't want fingers pointed at either you or your attack weasel
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 7:34 pm
Then again, I find it hilarious that you clowns thought it was funny when it was just me being abused, when it turned out someone did it to you, all of a sudden, you stiffs get pissed off. freaking hypocrites.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 7:31 pm
By the same token, the account that was created using EmmaRoydes was done the night that TA attacked me for the poster that mysteriously was posted on the science blog site. As you say, TA doesn't own that name any more than I own emmaroydes. CASE CLOSED
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 6:41 pm
we're gonna get the IP addresses of the "emmaroydes" account and the "terroraustralis" account from that site, and we're gonna ask motinet to compare them to the IP addresses of EVERY politifake member. we're gonna prove once and for all who did this.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 5:33 pm
the only person ON THIS FORUM who is desperately trying to convince everyone that TA or I are going around the web IMPERSONATING you is YOU.Clearly you want people to believe this:THAT'S YOUR AGENDA.And I dont see you recanting your accusation.CASE CLOSED
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 5:16 pm
I have no reason to trash fauxnews to begin with, he voluntarily left the site a few weeks ago.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 5:10 pm
Defending my honor? whoever created the TA account also trashed me and you along with fauxnews by claiming it was a single person who was a known internet troll. How would that be defending me?
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:50 pm
the day after your big argument with TA someone creates a phony TA acct on that site defending the honor of EmmaRoydes and accusing ME by name of impersonating you all the web. you expect us to believe TA created that? he's my friend. what a liar
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:49 pm
When i saw it in google search, my poster on snails was miraculously used on that account. Not very likely a coincidence. I'm sure that TA has many enemies on the web or someone who is trying to feed the arguments between us.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:46 pm
Plus, I don't think either of you has the balls to admit to doing it.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:46 pm
you also dont have a patent on the name EmmaRoydes. U admit that's NOT your real name.That you're so quick to accuse TA is what's suspicious.You could have many enemies on the web.It could be any one of'em.Why TA?Unless that's your plan, to discredit him
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:44 pm
I didn't do it, but one of the two of you must be the ones responsible for trashing me on that site. It fits your MO almost perfectly. Funny how you get mad about someone doing it to you, but think it's funny that someone did it to me.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:41 pm
until now, no one has mentioned IMPERSONATING anyone. Only you. You would think if TA or I were doing that to you, we would've brought it to your attention by now. Only you brought this up, the same day the fake TA account went up on that forum.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:38 pm
that's very clever, Emma. using other accounts on the web elsewhere to tarnish TA here. The fact you publicly exploit it here when you could've brought it up in private like a normal person makes it clear you are just doing this to be disruptive.
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 4:35 pm
why "attack dog?" why not a more glorious animal like a falcon or a tiger? If it makes you feel better, neither TA nor I were impersonating you on ANY site. In fact,your public outburst here makes me wonder if it was really just you this entire time
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:33 pm
hahahahaha, "a friend of mine just showed me that site" - right, but it wasn't you that did it, right? hahahahaha, nobody will buy that crap, you manipulating, useleless little crybaby. Odd how you can dish it out, but god forbid anyone stand up to you.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:30 pm
funny that you should call me dog meat after you sic'ed your attack dogs on me. All I have to say to that is "Woof!"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:28 pm
disagree with you?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:27 pm
oh, now it's a month, last night you were claiming two weeks, now you stretch it out to a month? What's next? Tomorrow are you going to claim it's been a couple of years since you tried to wean yourself off of calling people f***tard who, gasp, dared to
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:26 pm
You did more than 3 weeks of flooding the site with F***tard and f***wit name calling of me and others here. So stop crying
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:23 pm
I don't private message moooo or anyone else here, so try blowing smoke up someone else's skirt loser.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:23 pm
and in response to your threat, all I have to say to you is "waaaaaahhhhhh!"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:21 pm
but, whoever did it, I think it's cool that they were able to get you to wad up your panties again.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 4:21 pm
I've never impersonated you anywhere. I have too much self-respect to do that.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 4:10 pm
you are dog meat. i dont know how, but you're gonna pay for this. i swear on my life, you will f***ing pay.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 4:10 pm
http://www.thescienceforum.com/politics/46159-climate-change-debunked-liberal-hoax.html#post591959
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 4:07 pm
funny, because a friend of mine just showed me that site, and YOU'VE BEEN IMPERSONATING ME, YOU f***ING SACK OF ****. HOW f***ING DARE YOU, YOU MANIPULATIVE ****, I HOPE YOU f***ING DIE IN A FIRE.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 4:02 pm
emma didnt tell anyone they're wrong, she said they are LIARS. theres a VERY f***ING BIG DIFFERENCE.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 3:57 pm
dont f***ing tell me what "a man of science" would or wouldn't do, YOU ARENT ONE, you have nothing to base this a**umption on.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 3:55 pm
so three weeks of flooding the site with troll posters is okay, because the troll got called a f***tard?
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 3:54 pm
emma ADMITTED to TROLLING, which last i checked was AGAINST THE RULES. but she gets away with it because i called her a f***tard a month ago?
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 3:52 pm
maybe you should read the f***ing comment thread rather than basing your judgement on what emma has told you in private messages?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:34 pm
so, that shows you the childishness that I have to deal with when it comes to these clowns.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:32 pm
Those are the only two that i've discovered so far.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:32 pm
They also went to a liberal forum and created the same account, but didn't post anything there yet.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 2:31 pm
It gets better than that mooo, either TA or one of his attack dogs went to a science blog, created an account as emmaroydes, uploaded my poster, and started attacking the members on the site.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 11:18 am

You're a young man, many people are going to disagree with you during your lifetime. You need to learn how to handle that more rationally and calmly.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 11:17 am

....which simply isn't true. A man of science is adult enough to ignore those who disagree with him and would rarely resort to name calling in response. Honestly, I'd say you brought this war on yourself by expecting far too much from your opponent.
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 11:14 am

You admit to calling her names which just encourages retaliation and then you enlist your friends to come here and back you up. Also, you stated that telling a scientist that his science is wrong is akin to punching his child in the face.....
Mooooooooooooooooooo - September 16, 2014, 11:11 am

I don't know TA, you say you hate Emma because you "told her that denialists help the leftist agenda" and she refused to listen. It's her right not to listen, no one here can be forced to agree with you.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:57 am
You have a wonderful day (or night, whatever) I have to call it quits. Been real fun watching you step on your appendages.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:54 am
and that wasn't me, but you and foxrecon that used that argument.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:53 am
Your argument is the equivalent of Hitler saying that Stalin deserved to be invaded.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:52 am
besides, the ones who share your disgust happen to be attack dogs that you enlisted. Kind of invalidates your "point" now doesn't it?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:51 am
Like I said, you should go back and read comment threads before you claim to be above it all.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:48 am
but you're stupid enough to argue... nay, TROLL, FOR OVER THREE WEEKS, multiple people who share your disgust at how leftists abuse the global warming debate to further their own agenda?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:47 am
you might want to go back and read your comments before you claim sainthood.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:46 am
nah, you're the one that responds to "here's what I think" by saying "you F***ING F***TARD, how dare you impune something that I claim to be?"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:45 am
my mistake, her posting was on August 15 and you posted a response on September 15. See, I admit when I'm wrong, unlike others.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:45 am
you're the slapper. i'm the guy who's been saying "OI, STOP PISSING ON THE CARPET, MUTT"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:43 am
enough to argue with a mod.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:43 am
The problem that you are unable to see is that she came on like gang busters and attacked me repeatedly, mooo asked her to at least wait a while before posting like that, she became belligerent with him and the rest is history. I've never been stupid
CthulthuDownUnder - September 16, 2014, 1:43 am
you said "She just posted something in the forum". As in Julie? As I was leaving I just posted an Obama picture about SOAP to add to my collection. But I don't see Julie. Lose your mind again? Check the lost and found
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:41 am
works both ways, now doesn't it? Of course, you can't see that can you? Oh, you poor little lost soul, "Emma is so mean and all I did was act civil. Why does emma treat me like that? waaaaah, oops I think I just wet my pants again"
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:40 am
i was telling her the same thing i've been telling cthulu lately, "you need to back off, because emma WILL provoke you into saying something stupid and moo WILL ban you for it".
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:38 am
well, i havent slapped many dogs, but it doesnt take a genius to figure out that if you do it, the dog is probably gonna try and bite you.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:38 am
so, if anyone is to blame for her getting banned it would be either her or you since she's one of your disciples and you must have taught her well.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:36 am
and she just posted something in the forums, so it couldn't have made her bleed out or anything.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:35 am
Julie33 wasn't banned because of me, she was banned because she went after a mod using your tactics.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:35 am
exactly, as i said, the person who asked me to come and refute your bull**** lies is now banned.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:35 am
and then say "huh, he must be a troll because he didn't kiss my a** when I yelled F***TARD!"
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:35 am
i was asked to come and help refute your bull**** lies, and the person who asked is now banned. everyone else involved is involved because you personally attacked their profession.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:33 am
No, it's more like I post something and, instead of refuting it, you and your dogs start snarling, nipping, and biting. Your ego wouldn't let you just say something like "no, that's incorrect because ..." instead of "you f***ing f***tard"
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:31 am
because you can look at julie33's posting #70354 to see that she is the one that admitted to it.
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:31 am
and by "fight back" you mean "post lies that will aggravate people and provoke them into responding"? thats like getting attacked by your neighbor's dog, and deciding to fight back by wearing a suit made of steaks. do you realise how dumb that is?
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:28 am
Oh, are you denying that you called me those names? Or are you denying that you enlisted attack dogs?
terroraustralis - September 16, 2014, 1:28 am
while i use my words to refute your accusations that i am trolling, YOU use your words to take cheap sh**s at me. thanks for proving my point.
EmmaRoydes - September 16, 2014, 1:27 am
that's the absolute truth. But what you don't have a right to do is to call me f***tard or f***wit because you don't agree with me. And when your attack dogs go after me, I have the right to fight back.


'SAUVE QUI PEUT' - " THE SKY IS FALLING " - If the sequester lasts more than two months, there is a “about a ten percent chance” Earth suddenly falls off its axis and hurtle into the sun.




" OBAMA WILL RELEASE 30 MILLION BARRELS OF OIL FROM THE STRATEGIC PETROLEUM RESERVE " - The US uses around 18.5 million barrels a day.That's WOW TWO days worth!How Much cost refilling 30 Million Barrels?




DEMOCRATIC ATTACK ADS - Because nothing screams "distance yourself from Obama and his agenda and your previous support of it" by running nothing but attack ads




I'M BARACK OBAMA AND I APPROVE THIS AD -




FREE STUFF REALLY ISN'T FREE - Obama will forgive student loan debt if students won't forget to vote for him.




DESPERATE FOR A POLITIFAKE T-SHIRT - but I'm not unemployed, so I can't post the same repeated phrases several times a day, nor the same photos numerous times a week


TAGS: desperate
Rating: 4.2/5

More politifakes by JGalt

deerbag2 - November 27, 2012, 3:38 pm
AMEN!!!!!!
PapaFox - November 27, 2012, 10:37 am
LMAO! *Thumbs up*


IT'S NOT THE WOMAN'S FAULT -


TAGS: rapists should be castrated
Rating: 4/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

foxrecon19d - June 29, 2013, 4:11 pm
Drunken Democrat politicians... oh, wait... that falls under causes for man-slaughter


RABID DEMOCRATS - They're everywhere this year!




BUT OUR LEADERS CAN'T - Can't or won't? It's because money speaks louder than people




THE NEW DIRTY WORD: - Q: What's the worst thing you can call someone? A: A Democrat




End Corporate Tax Evasion -


TAGS: corporate tax evasion
Rating: 3.86/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - May 3, 2013, 11:35 am
Your rant about honesty or integrity is irrelevant. Corporations will take advantage of every tax loophole that is legally available, which (again) is the overall point -- close the loopholes.
Renza - May 3, 2013, 10:57 am
It's probably not the honesty or integrity of fellow humans, but rather specifically of corporate executives and politicians who are (generally) widely known for being self serving, greedy, and entirely willing to break laws (hence "white collar crime")
StoneTools - May 3, 2013, 10:16 am
your fellow humans? That does, however, explain why you often times call people liars on this site.
StoneTools - May 3, 2013, 10:15 am
bull****, a consumption tax would not allow tax evasion and would be much more evenhanded. Why is it that you trust lefty politicians without fail and defend even the most ridiculous statements from them, but have no faith in the honesty or integrity of
PapaFox - May 3, 2013, 10:07 am
Which would do nothing to stop the current corporate tax evasion, which is the overall point.
StoneTools - May 3, 2013, 9:15 am
wrong. It's time to do away with the current tax code and put something sensible in place. Like a flat tax or a consumption tax instead.
PapaFox - May 3, 2013, 9:11 am
Exactly. Hence the need to amend the tax code to put a stop to tax evasion.
StoneTools - May 3, 2013, 8:58 am
anything illegal about that? If you had the opportunity to squirrel away your money and not pay taxes on it, would you?


WHORE-GATE - Because releasing a recorded phone call with a "whore" comment has so much more class than a TV commercial saying the same thing. Shame Shame, Jerry Brown.




FORGET THE EXCUSES - A criminal is a criminal.




CORPORATE STATES OF AMERICA -




JAMES WEBB -




CORPORATE WELFARE - We should hold them to the same standards, yes?




CORPORATE WELFARE - Is this what America needs?


TAGS: corporate welfare
Rating: 3.69/5

More politifakes by PapaFox

PapaFox - February 20, 2013, 11:06 am
I promise not to tell anyone. :)
BALLS - February 20, 2013, 9:52 am
Holy hell, I actually agree with papafox on something.


DRINKING RATE HIGHEST SINCE '78 - Anyone question why? (Remember that 2nd-worst pres, a peanut farmer from Georgia) soon to be eclipsed by a community organizer from Chicago




PARANOIA - sheesh. Now Axelrod and Obama think that foreign interests are taking over our Chambers of Commerce and funding secret agendas! Poor Desperate Dems, must be election time again!




SOCIAL OUTCAST - Dems are avoidng Bammy when he comes to town. He can't fill a room when tickets are discounted. Rumor has it he will be appearing on Letterman, Leno and MTV before Nov. 2.




A.O.T.U.S. - Appeaser of the United States: "Can't we all just get along?"




Austerity Hypocrisy -




LIBERAL PUNDITS - Are working really hard to show some excitement over the thrashing that will take place Nov. 2nd




PREV PAGENEXT PAGE